When saddled with AWD, the T5 gets a respectable 20/29/23 mpg fuel economy. With the 240-hp, T5 version of the Volvo engine, the FWD Volvo XC60 T5 is rated as high as 23/30/26 mpg, with a combined figure that’s closer to the highway figure than it is in many vehicles. With FWD, the Acura and Cadillac get 23 and 22 mpg combined, respectively. (One of our editors observed 25.9 mpg after a 520-mile road trip, mostly on highways.) With AWD, the Acura and Cadillac are rated 22 and 21 mpg combined, respectively, though the Caddy makes up some cost by operating on regular gas. At worst, the AWD T6 (the stronger engine) gets an EPA-estimated 20/27/22 mpg city/highway/combined on premium gasoline. The updated engines preserve competitive fuel economy. It’s gravelly in the XC90 and even worse in the 60. Though it delivers lots of goods for a wee block, this engine sounds pretty raunchy. (The six-speed has been discontinued from the trims that still had it last year.) If anything, it responds more quickly to jabs at the accelerator than the 90 does. It performs well here, giving the XC60 some guts and working well with the eight-speed automatic transmission. The Volvo XC60 T6 we tested has the same optional engine as our loaded, long-term XC90: a turbocharged and supercharged 2.0-liter four-cylinder that produces 302 horsepower (that’s 14 hp less than the engine makes in the XC90). If I were to choose among the stated competitors on the basis of sportier dynamics, I’d go with the poise and effortless handling of the MKC, followed by the RDX. It feels reactive, which is fine for foul weather but doesn’t provide engaging dynamics. It doesn’t help that the 60’s all-wheel drive doesn’t send more power to the rear wheels for a more balanced, rear-wheel-drive feel like some modern AWD systems do.
Bearing in mind that handling isn’t one of the many things for which we’ve praised the XC90, the XC60 still feels a step behind. It’s sort of the worst of both worlds in that regard. In hard cornering, mid-corner bumps jerk the steering wheel almost violently. Though its curb weight compares within the class, it feels heavy in turns, perhaps due to steering that’s generally numb and devoid of feedback - at least positive feedback.
One is an option on the Cadillac and Lincoln, the latter of which needs it least. The XC60 offers no such adaptive suspension, nor does the Acura. It isn’t a marvel of comfort like an Volvo XC90 with air springs and adaptive shock absorbers, but neither is it as rock-hard as the XC90 feels without that optional suspension. It’s far from the boxy shapes for which Volvo was once known, but it’s still a bit outdated, especially when viewed alongside the well-regarded XC90 and its Thor’s Hammer-style headlights (newly standard for 2017).Įven with optional 20-inch alloy wheels (replacing the T6 AWD Inscription’s standard 19s), our car rode reasonably well - firmly, but not overly so versus competitors. We tested a T6 AWD Inscription.Ĭompeting compact SUVs include the Acura RDX, Cadillac XT5 and Lincoln MKC (see them compared with the Volvo here). Most notably, the base model adds a backup camera, blind spot warning, a panoramic moonroof, leather seats, navigation and more. All trims have added formerly optional features as standard equipment for 2017.
#2017 d1 dozer price plus#
The XC60’s “editions” now include Dynamic and Inscription, both with either engine (T5 or T6) and front- or all-wheel drive, plus the top trim: T6 AWD R-Design. These changes contribute to a condensed list of trims, down from 16 last year to seven for 2017. Rather than cylinder counts, T5 now refers to the less powerful engine and T6 to the more powerful one. Gone entirely are the five- and six-cylinder engines, leaving just two versions of the Drive-E 2.0-liter four-cylinder. brand portfolio, and it’s not long for this world. The XC60 is based on an old platform, from back when Volvo was part of the Ford Motor Co. We suspect the next-generation Volvo XC60 will appear at an auto show soon, and knowing how much Volvo has invested in its XC90 (which awarded our highest honor, naming it Best of 2016) and its new S90 sedan, I’m surprised the company has improved the XC60 as much as it has over the past few model years. Versus the competition: Running changes have kept the XC60 competitive in terms of efficiency, active-safety equipment and other ways a list of features might suggest, but a closer look reveals its age. The verdict: Volvo has kept the 2017 XC60 compact SUV reasonably up to date for an aging design, but there’s no question it pales in comparison to the multi-award-winning full-size XC90 that represents Volvo’s new direction.
0 kommentar(er)
